Communications

Gordon et al. (2021) Rewilding lite: Using traditional domestic livestock to achieve rewilding outcomes. Sustainability, 13(6): 3347.

Gordon et al. (2021) Domestic livestock and rewilding: Are they mutually exclusive?. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5.

Ross et al. (2020) A reintroduced ecosystem engineer provides a germination niche for native plant species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 29(3): 817—837.

Manning et al. (2020) Woodlands and woody debris: Understanding structure and composition to inform restoration. PLOS One, 15(3): e0224258.

Ross et al. (2019) Effects of digging by a native and introduced ecosystem engineer on soil physical and chemical properties in temperate grassy woodland. PeerJ, 7(8): e7506.

Evans et al. (2019) A long-term experiment reveals strategies for the ecological restoration of reptiles in scattered tree landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28(11): 2825—2843.

Munro et al. (2019) Returning a lost process by reintroducing a locally extinct digging marsupial. PeerJ, 7(5): e6622.

McIntyre et al. (2017) Trajectories of floristic change in grassland: landscape, land use legacy and seasonal conditions overshadow restoration actions. Applied Vegetation Science, 20(4): 582—593.

Le Roux et al. (2016) Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: Considerations for management and biodiversity offsets. Forest Ecology and Management, 366: 135—142.

Le Roux et al. (2016) Enriching small trees with artificial nest boxes cannot mimic the value of large trees for hollow-nesting birds. Restoration Ecology, 24(2): 252—258.

Le Roux et al. (2015) Single large or several small? Applying biogeographic principles to tree-level conservation and biodiversity offsets. Biological Conservation, 191: 558—566.

McIntyre et al. (2014) Restoration of eucalypt grassy woodland: Effects of experimental interventions on ground-layer vegetation. Australian Journal of Botany, 62(7): 570—579.

Manning et al. (2013) Bringing forward the benefits of coarse woody debris in ecosystem recovery under different levels of grazing and vegetation density. Biological Conservation, 157: 204—214.

Shorthouse et al. (2012) The 'making of' the Mulligans Flat - Goorooyarroo experimental restoration project. Ecological Management and Restoration, 13(2): 112-125.

Manning et al. (2011) Integrating research and restoration: The establishment of a long-term woodland experiment in south-eastern Australia. Australian Zoologist, 35(3): 633—648.

Manning et al. (2009) Restoring landscapes of fear with wolves in the Scottish Highlands. Biological Conservation, 142(10): 2314—2321.

Manning et al. (2009) Scattered trees: A complementary strategy for facilitating adaptive responses to climate change in modified landscapes?. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(4): 915—919.

Lindenmayer et al. (2008) Temporal changes in vertebrates during landscape transformation: A large-scale natural experiment. Ecological Monographs, 78(4): 567—590.

Lindenmayer et al. (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters, 11(1): 78—91.

Manning et al. (2007) A study of coarse woody debris volumes in two box-gum grassy woodland reserves in the Australian Capital Territory. Ecological Management and Restoration, 8(3): 221—224.

Lindenmayer et al. (2007) The complementarity of single-species and ecosystem-oriented research in conservation research. Oikos, 116(7): 1220—1226.

Lindenmayer et al. (2002) The focal-species approach and landscape restoration: A critique. Conservation Biology, 16(2): 338—345.

Read et al. (2023) Havens are a pathway, not an endpoint, for species recovery: a response to Woinarski et al. (2023). Biological Conservation, 285: 110212.

Andrewartha et al. (2023) Landscapes of nausea: successful conditioned taste aversion in a wild red fox population. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(8): e12984.

Smith et al. (2022) Mini Safe Havens for population recovery and reintroductions ‘beyond-the-fence’. Biodiversity and conservation, 32(1): 203–225.

Evans et al. (2022) Coexistence conservation: Reconciling threatened species and invasive predators through adaptive ecological and evolutionary approaches. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(7): e12742.

Andrewartha et al. (2021) Outfoxing the fox: Effect of prey odor on fox behavior in a pastoral landscape. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(12): e516.

Manning et al. (2021) Bettering the devil you know: Can we drive predator adaptation to restore native fauna? Conservation Science and Practice, 3(8): e447.

Evans et al. (2021) The ‘Goldilocks Zone’ of predation: the level of fox control needed to select predator resistance in a reintroduced mammal in Australia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(6): 1731–1752.

Brockett et al. (2022) Establishment, persistence and the importance of longitudinal monitoring in multi-source reintroductions. Animal Conservation, 25(4): 550–565.

Itoigawa et al. (2022) Functional diversity and evolution of bitter taste receptors in egg-laying mammals. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 39(6): msac107.

Cobden et al. (2023) High nest survival, but variable reproductive output in the Superb Parrot (Polytelis swainsonii). Emu, 123(1): 14—23.

Shokirov et al. (2023) Habitat highs and lows: Using terrestrial and UAV LiDAR for modelling avian species richness and abundance in a restored woodland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 285: 113326.

Stojanovic et al. (2023) Reproductive skew in a Vulnerable bird favors breeders that monopolize nest cavities. Animal Conservation, 26: 675–683.

Stojanovic et al. (2021) Suitable nesting sites for specialized cavity dependent wildlife are rare in woodlands. Forest Ecology and Management, 483: 118718.

Evans et al. (2020) Beyond the pond: Terrestrial habitat use by frogs in a changing climate. Biological Conservation, 249: 108712.

Evans et al. (2019) Beetle ecological indicators – a comparison of cost vs reward to understand functional changes in response to restoration actions. Ecological Indicators, 104: 209—218.

Ringma et al. (2019) Systematic planning can rapidly close the protection gap in Australian mammal havens. Conservation Letters, 12(1): e12611.

Le Roux et al. (2018) The value of scattered trees for wildlife: Contrasting effects of landscape context and tree size. Diversity and Distributions, 24(1): 69—81.

Radford et al. (2018) Degrees of population-level susceptibility of Australian terrestrial non-volant mammal species to predation by the introduced red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and feral cat (Felis catus). Wildlife Research, 45(7): 645—657.

Barton et al. (2017) Environmental and spatial drivers of spider diversity at contrasting microhabitats. Austral Ecology, 42(6): 700—710.

Hamonts et al. (2017) Effects of ecological restoration on soil microbial diversity in a temperate grassy woodland. Applied Soil Ecology, 117: 117—128.

Ross et al. (2017) Fine-scale drivers of beetle diversity are affected by vegetation context and agricultural history. Austral Ecology, 42(7): 831—843.

Barton et al. (2016) Substantial long-term effects of carcass addition on soil and plants in a grassy eucalypt woodland. Ecosphere, 7(10): e01537.

Howland et al. (2016) Birds of a feather flock together: Using trait-groups to understand the effect of macropod grazing on birds in grassy habitats. Biological Conservation, 194: 89—99.

Macdonald et al. (2015) Can coarse woody debris be used for carbon storage in open grazed woodlands? Journal of Environmental Quality, 44(4): 1210—1215.

Rayner et al. (2015) Avifauna and urban encroachment in time and space. Diversity and Distributions, 21(4): 428—440.

Barton et al. (2014) Contrasting diversity dynamics of phoretic mites and beetles associated with vertebrate carrion. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 63(1): 1—13.

Howland et al. (2014) Eaten out of house and home: Impacts of grazing on ground-dwelling reptiles in Australian grasslands and grassy woodlands. PLOS One, 9(12): e105966.

Ikin et al. (2014) Bird community responses to the edge between suburbs and reserves. Oecologia, 174(2): 545—557.

Le Roux et al. (2014) Reduced availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes: Implications for policy and practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 57—64.

Le Roux et al. (2014) The future of large old trees in urban landscapes. PLOS One 9(6): e99403.

Lindenmayer et al. (2014) New policies for old trees: Averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conservation Letters, 7(1): 61—69.

Macdonald et al. (2014) Carrion decomposition causes large and lasting effects on soil amino acid and peptide flux. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 69: 132—140.

Manning et al. (2014) New evidence of late survival of beaver in Britain. Holocene, 24(12): 1849—1855.

Rayner et al. (2014) Evaluating empirical evidence for decline in temperate woodland birds: A nationally threatened assemblage of species. Biological Conservation, 171: 145—155.

Rayner et al. (2014) Are protected areas maintaining bird diversity? Ecography, 37(1): 43—53.

Azhar et al. (2013) Contribution of illegal hunting, culling of pest species, road accidents and feral dogs to biodiversity loss in established oil-palm landscapes. Wildlife Research, 40(1): 1—9.

Azhar et al. (2013) The influence of agricultural system, stand structural complexity and landscape context on foraging birds in oil palm landscapes. Ibis, 155(2): 297—312.

Barton et al. (2013) The role of carrion in maintaining biodiversity and ecological processes in terrestrial ecosystems. Oecologia, 171(4): 761—772.

Barton et al. (2013) Species traits predict assemblage dynamics at ephemeral resource patches created by carrion. PLOS One, 8(1): e53961.

Barton et al. (2013) The spatial scaling of beta diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 22(6): 639—647.

Ikin et al. (2013) Pocket parks in a compact city: How do birds respond to increasing residential density? Landscape Ecology, 28(1): 45—56.

Ikin et al. (2013) The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Diversity and Distributions, 19(3): 294—306.

Manning et al. (2013) Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow-dependent species. Animal Conservation, 16(4): 395—403.

Ikin et al. (2012) Linking bird species traits to vegetation characteristics in a future urban development zone: Implications for urban planning. Urban Ecosystems, 15(4): 961—977.

Stagoll et al. (2012) Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conservation Letters, 5(2): 115—122.

Azhar et al. (2011) The conservation value of oil palm plantation estates, smallholdings and logged peat swamp forest for birds. Forest Ecology and Management, 262(12): 2306—2315.

Barton et al. (2011) Morphological traits as predictors of diet and microhabitat use in a diverse beetle assemblage. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102(2): 301—310.

Barton et al. (2011) Experimental reduction of native vertebrate grazing and addition of logs benefit beetle diversity at multiple scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(4): 943—951.

Barton et al. (2010) Fine-scale heterogeneity in beetle assemblages under co-occurring Eucalyptus in the same subgenus. Journal of Biogeography, 37(10): 1927—1937.

Manning et al. (2010) Could native scots pines (Pinus sylvestris) still persist in northern England and southern Scotland?. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 3(2): 187—201.

Stagoll et al. (2010) Using bird-habitat relationships to inform urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98(1): 13—25.

Barton et al. (2009) Conserving ground-dwelling beetles in an endangered woodland community: Multi-scale habitat effects on assemblage diversity. Biological Conservation, 142(8): 1701—1709.

Manning & Lindenmayer (2009) Paddock trees, parrots and agricultural production: An urgent need for large-scale, long-term restoration in south-eastern Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration, 10(2): 126—135.

Gibbons et al. (2008) The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conservation Biology, 22(5): 1309—1319.

Manning et al. (2007) Large-scale spatial and temporal dynamics of the vulnerable and highly mobile superb parrot. Journal of Biogeography, 34(2): 289—304.

Fischer et al. (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: Ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4(2): 80—86.

Manning et al. (2006) Scattered trees are keystone structures - Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 132(3): 311—321.

Manning et al. (2006) Multi-scale site and landscape effects on the vulnerable superb parrot of south-eastern Australia during the breeding season. Landscape Ecology, 21(7): 1119—1133.

Manning et al. (2005) A bioclimatic analysis for the highly mobile Superb Parrot of south-eastern Australia. Emu, 105(3): 193—201.

Manning et al. (2004) The conservation implications of bird reproduction in the agricultural matrix: A case study of the vulnerable superb parrot of south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 120(3): 363—374.

Wilson et al. (2023) Roadmap to recovery revealed through the reintroduction of an IUCN Red List species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 32(1): 227—248.

Smith et al. (2023) Countering ecological misconceptions with strategic translocation and assessment of microhabitat use. Biological Conservation, 284: 110143.

Evans et al. (2023) Trends in animal translocation research. Ecography, 2023(3): e06528.

Evans et al. (2022) Reintroduction biology and the IUCN Red List: The dominance of species of Least Concern in the peer-reviewed literature. Global Ecology and Conservation, 38: e02242.

Wilson et al. (2022) Personality and plasticity predict post-release performance in a reintroduced mesopredator. Animal Behaviour 187: 177–189.

Wilson et al. (2020) Adapting reintroduction tactics in successive trials increases the likelihood of establishment for an endangered carnivore in a fenced sanctuary. PLOS One, 15(6): e0234455.

Abicair et al. (2020) Habitat selection and genetic diversity of a reintroduced ‘refugee species’. Animal Conservation, 23(3): 330—341.

Portas et al. (2020) Baseline health and disease assessment of founder eastern quolls (Dasyurus viverrinus) during a conservation translocation to mainland Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 56(3): 547–559.

Manning et al. (2019) Transition to density dependence in a reintroduced ecosystem engineer. Biodiversity and conservation, 28(14): 3803–3830.

Legge et al. (2018) Havens for threatened Australian mammals: The contributions of fenced areas and offshore islands to the protection of mammal species susceptible to introduced predators. Wildlife Research, 45(7): 627–644.

Batson et al. (2017) The effect of pre-release captivity on the stress physiology of a reintroduced population of wild eastern bettongs. Journal of Zoology, 303(4): 311–319.

Portas et al. (2016) Beyond morbidity and mortality in reintroduction programmes: changing health parameters in reintroduced eastern bettongs Bettongia gaimardi. Oryx, 50(4): 674—683.

Batson et al. (2016) The effect of pre-release captivity on post-release performance in reintroduced eastern bettongs Bettongia gaimardi. Oryx, 50(4): 664–673.

Batson et al. (2015) Translocation tactics: a framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(6): 1598—1607.

Portas et al. (2014) Health evaluation of free-ranging eastern bettongs (Bettongia gaimardi) during translocation for reintroduction in Australia. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 50(2): 210–223.

Bennett et al. (2013) Causes of reintroduction failure of the brown treecreeper: Implications for ecosystem restoration. Austral Ecology, 38(6): 700–712.

Sheean et al. (2012) An assessment of scientific approaches towards species relocations in Australia. Austral Ecology, 37(2): 204–215.

Bennett et al. (2012) The anatomy of a failed reintroduction: A case study with the Brown Treecreeper. Emu, 112(4): 298–312.

Bennett et al. (2012) Habitat selection and post-release movement of reintroduced brown treecreeper individuals in restored temperate woodland. PLOS One, 7(12): e50612.

Ikin et al. (2015) Key lessons for achieving biodiversity-sensitive cities and towns. Ecological Management and Restoration, 16(3): 206—214.

Newport et al. (2014) The effects of light and noise from urban development on biodiversity: Implications for protected areas in Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration, 15(3): 204—214.

Manning et al. (2010) Mind the gap: Future depends on sciences and humanities. Nature, 463(7280): 425.

Fischer et al. (2009) Fostering constructive debate: A reply to Chappell et al. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(4): 184.

Manning et al. (2009) Landscape fluidity - A unifying perspective for understanding and adapting to global change. Journal of Biogeography, 36(2): 193—199.

Fischer et al. (2008) Should agricultural policies encourage land sparing or wildlife-friendly farming?. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(7): 380—385.

Dovers et al. (2008) Uncertainty, complexity and the environment. In G Bammer & M Smithson (ed.), Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp. 245-260.

Fischer et al. (2007) Mind the sustainability gap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(12): 621—624.

Manning (2007) Ecosystems, ecosystem processes and global change: Implications for landscape design. In DB Lindenmayer & RJ Hobbs (ed.), Managing and Designing Landscapes for Conservation: Moving from Perspectives to Principles, Blackwell Publishing, New Jersey, pp. 347—364.

Manning et al. (2006) Stretch goals and backcasting: Approaches for overcoming barriers to large-scale ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 14(4): 487—492.

Manning et al. (2004) Continua and Umwelt: Novel perspectives on viewing landscapes. Oikos, 104(3): 621—628.

Manning et al. (1997) Roman impact on the environment at Hadrian's wall: Precisely dated pollen analysis from Vindolanda, northern England. Holocene, 7(2): 175—186.